Skype’s login service is down.

Other than a brief post:

Some of you may have problems signing in to Skype – we’re investigating, and we’re sorry for the disruption to your conversations

Our engineers and site operations team are working non-stop to get things back to normal – thanks for your continued patience

What are we doing to help? Our engineers are creating new ‘mega-supernodes’ as fast as they can, which should gradually return things to normal. This may take a few hours, and we sincerely apologise for the disruption to your conversations.

"Put down the phone. Slowly walk away. Say hi to the person next to you. Yes, that's a human. Yes, they are real."

Too much technology consumes our daily lives.

Ironic topic for a blog post? Probably. Blasphemous for a guy whose entire livelihood depends on the fact that internet connections barely even dreamable ten years ago are available at his house? Sure. True? Absolutely.

Last week I took four plane rides (thanks Usairways* for $27 first class upgrades) and spent four days on a cruise. In the airport, my disappointment towards people engaged in asinine, pointless conversations simply to avoid feeling disconnected made me sad. In The Hitchhiker’s Guide* they talk of a planet where the inhabitants need to talk constantly in order to keep their brains from working— well friends… we are there. Today, planes offer cell and wi-fi service so you can stay connected on the go. As a DBA, server admin and technology leader in a small team handling high-transaction, high-availability systems, I understand that emergencies happen. I have solved many problems driving 70+ mph down I-75 on my Verizon aircard (Passenger seat). That said — in over ten years of “mission critical” system responsibility, I have never had a business need that I couldn’t defer or delegate for less than six hours to take a flight.

On the cruise, we left the technological world behind. When I wanted to meet up with my friends, we had to pre-arrange it or just *gasp* roam around and find one another. We couldn’t call or text or tweet or blog. For almost four entire days, we used nothing but direct, personal communication. It was glorious.

No conversations were interrupted by an “urgent” phone call. No one secluded themselves in a private world by clinging to someone on the other end of a mobile phone. People actually interacted with new people. People made new friends. People spent time with old friends. Relationships were formed. Some of them ended with departure from a foreign port, some when the boat docked, some will end next week, or next month, and a precious few will last a lifetime. This is the silent victim of the new media revolution.

Email, blogs, Facebook, geocities, etc. were a way for friends to network and keep up with one another across great distances. Even when I was young (and using BBS‘s), the virtual world was a gateway to making real-world relationships. Now it’s the replacement. We use instant messaging, text messaging, Facebooking, MySpacing and Youtubing to avoid real, meaningful human contact. We don’t make friends anymore, we make virtual acquaintances.

Technology becomes cheaper, faster, more accessible. The disease spreads. The art and beauty of human contact dies an unceremonious death. We won’t even notice till three weeks later, when the smell is finally enough to tip someone off. By then, it will be gone and there will be no bringing it back.

Is it too late? Am I overly dramatic?

I take comfort in the backlash…could this bring the next next step,  marketing of premium, anti-technology travel?

“For every market, a sub-market grows…” -Grave Robber

*Footnote: Apologies to Fred for shout-outs to two of his nemeses, Amazon and USAirways.

Our Hero

Early humans found hollowed out rocks to turn into homes, originating the term “Cave men”. ¹ This constraint made community difficult, so humans advanced to creating homes from natural materials, such as wood. Primitive homes were modeled on the cave, with nothing but some closed walls and an uncovered opening. Thousands of years of evolution lead us to create doors that open, close, and lock, and windows that allow us to see out and in, then glass to keep what’s out out and what’s in in, then curtains to cover what’s both out and in. In the end, we have the same caves we had before, with our darkness and privacy.

In the 1600′s the Dutch East India company was like the Wal-Mart of the high seas. If you worked on a ship for the DEI, actually called VOC, but let’s not have an acromania tournament over it, you lived day in and day out with the other people on the ship. Everyone knew everyone’s business, and that’s just how it was. There would be no need to do a status update when you went to the head, because everyone watched you go.

With the onset of industrialization and assembly-style production in the 1900′s, factories became central to small towns and people began working together, but their was a similar environment of everyone knew everyone’s family and friends and kids and lifestyle. There just weren’t a lot of secrets. Only in the last 50 years have we moved to the cubiclised, white-collar, technically-oriented jobs where turnover is an expectation and no one really bothers to get to know everyone else. Cliques form, but on the whole there isn’t a sense of community.

In a relatively short span of time, we created a generation and a culture that has a “right to privacy.” We have seen this concept denied by courts who say employers can regulate lifestyle as a condition of employment, and that what an employee does outside of work can still be used against her at work. Drinking, drugs, cigarettes, and even functions allowed to be attended can all be used as conditions of employment in our “right to work” world.  Though it has been upheld time and time again, the belief in this right grows ever stronger.

The political buzzword of the last decade has been “transparency.” We the people should have an open window on the workings of our government, of our corporations, of our financial institutions. We should see how the cogs turn and the deals are made, we should have open access to it all. At the same time, a subculture of companies has grown around controlling the online image of individuals. Ex-boyfriend posted some risque pictures of you? They can fix that. You got fired from your old job for coming to work drunk, and some people decided to blog about it? They can fix that. From the benign to the outright slanderous, companies that specialize in online identity rehab are doing bang up business curing the internet of individuals’ indiscretions.

Should it matter? Should you want to work for a company that would use your facebook status update about hating filing against you in an interview? Does that tweet about being drunk at the Alice In Chains concert make you a bad person or in any way impact your job performance? Are companies better off pretending that their employees don’t have a personal life? Maybe this is the wake up call that companies need to start treating their employees like people. Maybe it’s time to open up the door to the cave and not worry about what others will see, because their cave door is wide open too.

^{1. This is rather vague and unresearched proposition, because this is a tech blog and not an anthropology blog. Please do not blame us when you crib this and fail your class.}

If you want to be judgmental of our thoughts, feel free to follow Fred and Patrick on twitter!

How's the view up there?

Cloud Computing, the buzz phrase that won’t go away, attracts new users daily. The most common “cloud” approach uses resources, accessible through the public internet, as a service. Although this computing approach provides (generally) much higher rates of reliability and lower rollout cost, an organization looking to the cloud may find some grey skies on the security forecast.

Besides unknown physical access concerns to your data (as well as not truly knowing who can access your “system”), the main security risk resides with the end user. Take for example Twitter. For the third time this year, someone accessed sensitive corporate documents via an employee email account. If a password can be guessed, cracked, or obtained, chances are your security just became a little foggy (ok, no more cloud puns).

Storing sensitive information in the cloud (including your web accessible email accounts) seems to be the 2009 equivalent of leaving your briefcase on the front seat of your car parked in a very open driveway. The AP recently posted an article on the Twitter reference, and it’s not a bad read.

Twitter hacked by old technique — again

July 15, 2009
JORDAN ROBERTSON

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - Breaking into someone’s e-mail can be child’s play for a determined hacker, as Twitter Inc. employees have learned the hard way – again.

For the third time this year, the San Francisco-based company was the victim of a security breach stemming from a simple end-run around its defenses. In the latest case, a hacker guessed the password for an employee’s personal e-mail account and worked from there to steal confidential company documents.

The techniques used by the attackers highlight the dangers of a broader trend promoted by Google Inc. and others toward storing more data online, instead of on computers under your control.

The shift toward doing more over the Web – a practice known as “cloud computing” – means that mistakes employees make in their private lives can do serious damage to their employers, because a single e-mail account can tie the two worlds together.

Stealing the password for  someone’s Gmail account, for example, not only gives the hacker access to that person’s personal e-mail, but also to any other Google applications they might use for work, like those used to create spreadsheets or presentations.

That’s apparently what happened to Twitter, which shares confidential data within the company through the Google Apps package that incorporates e-mail, word processing, spreadsheet, calendar and other Google services for $50 per user per year.

Co-founder Biz Stone wrote in a blog posting Wednesday that the personal e-mail of an unnamed Twitter administrative employee was hacked about a month ago, and through that the attacker got access to the employee’s Google Apps account.

Separately, the wife of co-founder Evan Williams also had her personal e-mail hacked around the same time, Stone wrote. Through that, the attacker got access to Williams’ personal Amazon and PayPal accounts.

Stone said the attacks are “about Twitter being in enough of a spotlight that folks who work here can become targets.”

Some of the material the hacker posted online from the Google Apps documents was more embarrassing than damaging, like floor plans for new office space and a pitch for a TV show about the increasingly popular online messaging service.

Twitter says only one user account was potentially compromised because a screenshot of the account was included among the stolen documents. The value in hijacking a user’s account is limited, as those attacks are mainly used to post fake messages and try to trick the victim’s friends into clicking on links that will infect their computers.

Sensitive Twitter documents were filched, though.

The hacker claims to have employee salaries and credit card numbers, resumes from job applicants, internal meeting reports and growth projections.

TechCrunch, a widely read technology blog, says it was e-mailed the documents, and subsequently published some of them, including financial projections that Twitter drew up in February. The forecast envisioned Twitter generating its first revenue in the current quarter, with sales of about $400,000 and about 60 employees. By the end of next year, Twitter expected to employ about 345 people with annual revenue of about $140 million, according to the documents published by TechCrunch.

Stone said in an e-mail that most of the documents TechCrunch has access to are “speculative exercises.”

In his blog post, Stone said the stolen documents “are not polished or ready for prime time and they’re certainly not revealing some big, secret plan for taking over the world,” but said they are sensitive enough that their public release could jeopardize relationships with Twitter’s partners.

Stone said the company is talking to lawyers about “what this theft means for Twitter, the hacker, and anyone who accepts and subsequently shares or publishes these stolen documents.”

What the attacks on Twitter show is that Web sites don’t need to get compromised in the traditional sense to put its users and employees at risk.

Hackers don’t need to find a vulnerability in the site itself, or plant a virus on an employee’s computer, to sneak inside.

• http://tr.im/voipform

And, to view the directory, point your favorite web browser to:

• http://tr.im/voipview

About VoIP Users Conference

The VoIP Users Conference is open to all levels of VoIP expertise — from the total beginner to the experienced developer. The idea of the conference is to share knowledge, bring new people into the community, and to promote VoIP. Although the conference talks a lot about Asterisk, it is not limited to that. For more information, please visit (and join) www.voipusersconference.org.

About Twitter

Twitter is a service for friends, family, and co–workers to communicate and stay connected through the exchange of quick, frequent answers to one simple question: What are you doing? 

More Resources

• Fred’s Twitter Feed
• Patrick’s Twitter Feed
• VoIP Users Conference Twitter Feed

VoicePulse used Twitter to Update their Network Outage

VoicePulse, a New Jersey based VoIP Provider for residential and business consumers, experienced outages early starting Monday morning. Although the VoicePulse website is down, the company reported via their Twitter account at 10:30am EST:

VoicePulse is currently experiencing a partial service outage due to a generator explosion at one of our NYC datacenters.

At 10:49 they updated:

Engineers are on-site, but police & fire activity is currently preventing access to the building. SIP termination via SJC is working.

As of this post, VoicePulse incoming calls are still unable to connect, however outbound SIP calls can be terminated through their west coast gateways. Although having a single point of failure is very bad, we have to give VoicePulse credit for using Twitter to notify users of the situation.

Update:

At 11:24 am they advised:

VoicePulse Connect users that have old configs can view the correct sip.conf (with west coast peers) at http://www.pastebin.ca/1291545

and at 11:25 am:

Inbound carriers generally send calls via IP. Carriers are being contacted to make emergency changes to route inbound calls via SJC IPs.

At 12:11 pm:

Registrations restored to JFK/SJC. Waiting on larger carriers to move traffic to SJC IPs. Calls via smaller carriers moved already.

Last Updates:

VoicePulse posted these updates at 2:30 pm:

Website is up. VoicePulse Connect customers using JFK/SJC should be up and running for inbound/outbound.

If you didn’t move your SIP traffic off connect01, 02, 03 when we introduced SJC & JFK, you can access the sample configs and module now.

So Motrin (yeah, the pain reliever) just a little headache today courtesy of Twitter. They launched a new ad campaign targeting the pains of moms… however… the campaign did not sit well. Not well at all.

Mothers took offense to the add (perhaps the claims that carrying a baby is in fashion now) and posted complaints on twitter. Motrin ended up blogging an apology:

McNeil Meets Twitter – We Hear You

November 17th, 2008

By Kathy Widmer, Vice President of Marketing, McNeil Consumer Healthcare

This weekend, a lot was said about Motrin on Twitter and in the blogosphere. Unfortunately, it was not the kind of conversation that we here at McNeil had hoped to be at the center of.

For those who haven’t been following this, it all began when we ran an advertisement online over the weekend that talked about babywearing – which is a term that we used to describe carrying a child in a sling or wrap.

It was meant to engender sympathy and appreciation for all that parents do for their kids, but did so through an attempt at humor that missed the mark and many moms found offensive.

Now as you can imagine, we certainly didn’t mean to offend moms through our advertising. As a mom of three girls, I understand many of the comments made and agree that we know what’s best for our kids and for ourselves.

On behalf of McNeil, I’m sorry if you found this advertisement insulting. We are are in the process of removing it from our website. Unfortunately, it will take longer for us to remove this advertisement from magazines as several are currently on newsstands and in distribution.

One bright spot is that we have learned through this process – in particular, the importance of paying close attention to the conversations that are taking place online. It has also brought home the importance of taking a broader look at what we say and how it may be interpreted

Our take? Very interesting on how Twitter can create quick impact… now it’s time to move on to something better… like the economy, Darfur, domestic violence, or anything else.

Links:

• Controversial Motrin Moms Commerical on You Tube
• Follow Fred on Twitter