<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Diff’rent VoIP for Diff’rent Folks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.voiptechchat.com/voip/230/different-voip-for-different-folks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.voiptechchat.com/voip/230/different-voip-for-different-folks/</link>
	<description>Patrick and Fred Chat... sometimes about VoIP</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:10:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patrick and Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.voiptechchat.com/voip/230/different-voip-for-different-folks/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick and Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.voiptechchat.com/?p=230#comment-223</guid>
		<description>Thank you all for your comments!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you all for your comments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Goecke</title>
		<link>http://www.voiptechchat.com/voip/230/different-voip-for-different-folks/comment-page-1/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Goecke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.voiptechchat.com/?p=230#comment-221</guid>
		<description>Good post. But of course my way is the right way. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post. But of course my way is the right way. <img src='http://www.voiptechchat.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: And we&#8217;re back&#8230; &#124; Fred Posner dot com</title>
		<link>http://www.voiptechchat.com/voip/230/different-voip-for-different-folks/comment-page-1/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>And we&#8217;re back&#8230; &#124; Fred Posner dot com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.voiptechchat.com/?p=230#comment-220</guid>
		<description>[...] we&#8217;re back online and I&#8217;d love to share a new geeky blog post I wrote: Diff&#8217;rent VoIP for Diff&#8217;rent Folks. Oh, and I was interviewed by the Ann Arbor Chronicle about the parking lot application. The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we&#8217;re back online and I&#8217;d love to share a new geeky blog post I wrote: Diff&#8217;rent VoIP for Diff&#8217;rent Folks. Oh, and I was interviewed by the Ann Arbor Chronicle about the parking lot application. The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael S Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.voiptechchat.com/voip/230/different-voip-for-different-folks/comment-page-1/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael S Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.voiptechchat.com/?p=230#comment-219</guid>
		<description>Awesome post! 

I started out playing with Asterisk and ran into problems with specific features. FreeSWITCH was still very new at that point so I just watched and tinkered with both at the same time. Eventually FS got to the point where its functionality met my needs and then I jumped in full throttle. Oh, and I never looked back!

That being said, I agree with the basic idea presented here: do what works for you. I know a lot of people who just want a PBX out of the box and they use Asterisk or one of its derivatives like Trixbox. On the other hand, I know many power users who dropped Asterisk and use FreeSWITCH because of scalability or other concerns. 

I&#039;ll openly confess my bias towards FreeSWITCH. I highly recommend checking it out. Perhaps it will be &quot;the right stroke&quot; for you.

-MC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome post! </p>
<p>I started out playing with Asterisk and ran into problems with specific features. FreeSWITCH was still very new at that point so I just watched and tinkered with both at the same time. Eventually FS got to the point where its functionality met my needs and then I jumped in full throttle. Oh, and I never looked back!</p>
<p>That being said, I agree with the basic idea presented here: do what works for you. I know a lot of people who just want a PBX out of the box and they use Asterisk or one of its derivatives like Trixbox. On the other hand, I know many power users who dropped Asterisk and use FreeSWITCH because of scalability or other concerns. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll openly confess my bias towards FreeSWITCH. I highly recommend checking it out. Perhaps it will be &#8220;the right stroke&#8221; for you.</p>
<p>-MC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Michels</title>
		<link>http://www.voiptechchat.com/voip/230/different-voip-for-different-folks/comment-page-1/#comment-218</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Michels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.voiptechchat.com/?p=230#comment-218</guid>
		<description>This is interesting from a technology perspective, but I don&#039;t think the typical buyer cares about the underlying technology. 

The buyer cares about Price, Features, and Support. 

Price: Is usually #1, and although the initial cost of the equipment is a big factor, total cost of ownership needs to be evaluated. TCO includes all the professional services, ongoing maintenance, costs of potential outages, and competitive options. A good chunk of the cost of a phone system is the cost of the phones themselves - and digital phones remain cheaper - particularly if you have cat-3 wiring or need POE switches for VoIP. Hybrid switches offer remote teleworker phones, unified messaging, and may other &quot;VoIP&quot; features at a lower price. 

Features: The big picture on most feature sets is they are pretty similar. There are some cutting edge first market benefits, but proper maintenance plans will eliminate those differences. 

Support: This is the big one. Customers want a relationship with a vendor that they can communicate with and has a business model around service rather than nickel and diming customers. They also don&#039;t want to be locked into a single dealer, and want some independent measure of qualification (certifications). 

The best combination, which is 100% independent of the underlying technology, wins. The best combination differs by customer since they value different things. Some will value the underlying tech more than others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is interesting from a technology perspective, but I don&#8217;t think the typical buyer cares about the underlying technology. </p>
<p>The buyer cares about Price, Features, and Support. </p>
<p>Price: Is usually #1, and although the initial cost of the equipment is a big factor, total cost of ownership needs to be evaluated. TCO includes all the professional services, ongoing maintenance, costs of potential outages, and competitive options. A good chunk of the cost of a phone system is the cost of the phones themselves &#8211; and digital phones remain cheaper &#8211; particularly if you have cat-3 wiring or need POE switches for VoIP. Hybrid switches offer remote teleworker phones, unified messaging, and may other &#8220;VoIP&#8221; features at a lower price. </p>
<p>Features: The big picture on most feature sets is they are pretty similar. There are some cutting edge first market benefits, but proper maintenance plans will eliminate those differences. </p>
<p>Support: This is the big one. Customers want a relationship with a vendor that they can communicate with and has a business model around service rather than nickel and diming customers. They also don&#8217;t want to be locked into a single dealer, and want some independent measure of qualification (certifications). </p>
<p>The best combination, which is 100% independent of the underlying technology, wins. The best combination differs by customer since they value different things. Some will value the underlying tech more than others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
